Changelog for manufacturer-PPDs-10.2-545.2.noarch.rpm :

* Mon Sep 12 2022 Dirk Müller - use grep -E instead of egrep to be compatible with newer grep versions
* Thu Jun 25 2020 Ludwig Nussel - BuildRequires cups-rpm-helper to fix printer driver provides (boo#1172407)
* Mon Dec 11 2017 dimstarAATTopensuse.org- Fix build with RPM 4.14. When grep finds no match, it returns with retval=1, which in turn is interpreted by RPM as \'failure\'. Old RPM versions had a logic error and \'sometimes\' did not cancel when a command returned 1, this issue is fixed with RPM 4.14 (and in turn asks of us to be more specific in some cases what we want).
* Mon Nov 27 2017 jsmeixAATTsuse.de- Removed all recode remainders in spec file: Since a long time calling \'recode ibmpc..lat1 $PPD\' does not work and fails with \'recode: $PPD failed: Ambiguous output in step CR-LF..data\' so that it had no effect since a long time (boo#1053646).
* Fri Nov 24 2017 sbrabecAATTsuse.com- Drop broken recode support (FATE#323644).
* Sat Apr 29 2017 bwiedemannAATTsuse.com- Call \'gzip -n -9\' to make build more reproducible and have smaller results.
* Tue Mar 05 2013 cooloAATTsuse.com- Update license to new format.
* Fri Mar 30 2012 jsmeixAATTsuse.de- Empty the changelog section in the spec file.
* Fri May 29 2009 jsmeixAATTsuse.de- Removed all TurbolinuxJapanesePPDs because all contain \"cupsomatic\" as \"cupsFilter\" but \"cupsomatic\" is outdated since a long time and no longer included in our up-to-date foomatic-filters version 4.0.1 package. It might work to create a symbolic link \"cupsomatic -> foomatic-rip\" in the /usr/lib[64]/cups/filter/ directory to still use outdated \"cupsomatic\" PPDs even with a current foomatic-rip but it was not tested to what extent this might work.
* Fri Sep 05 2008 jsmeixAATTsuse.de- Keep all PPDs even if cupstestppd FAILs. With each CUPS version upgrade cupstestppd finds more and more errors so that more and more PPDs would be no longer included in the RPM which have been included before which results a regression. As far as we know there have been no problems at all because of not strictly compliant PPDs in so that it is much better to provide all PPDs so that the matching printers can be used than to be rigorous regarding compliance to the PPD spec.