| Name : perl-Acme-No
| |
| Version : 0.03
| Vendor : obs://build_opensuse_org/devel:languages:perl
|
| Release : 7.2
| Date : 2015-06-09 14:04:22
|
| Group : Development/Libraries/Perl
| Source RPM : perl-Acme-No-0.03-7.2.src.rpm
|
| Size : 0.01 MB
| |
| Packager : (none)
| |
| Summary : makes no() work the way I want it to
|
Description :
ok, first the appropriate pod:
$ perldoc \'-f\' no =item no Module VERSION LIST
=item no Module VERSION
=item no Module LIST
=item no Module
See the L< /use> function, which C< no> is the opposite of.
now, one might think that, since
use mod_perl 1.27;
makes sure that mod_perl is at least version 1.27,
no mod_perl 1.27;
should mean that 1.27 is too high - the manpage says use() and no() are
opposites, and that looks like opposite behavior to me. however...
$ perl -e \'use mod_perl 2.0\'
mod_perl version 2 required--this is only version 1.2701 at -e line 1.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1.
$ perl -e \'no mod_perl 2.0\'
mod_perl version 2 required--this is only version 1.2701 at -e line 1.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1.
so, no() and use() do the exact same thing here - hmmm... looks like a bug
in perl core...
enter Acme::No
Acme::No makes no() work the way I want it to.
$ perl -MAcme::No -e\'no v5.9.0; print \"ok\
\"\'
Perl v5.009 too high--version less than v5.009 required at -e line 0
$ perl -MAcme::No -e\'no v5.9.1; print \"ok\
\"\'
ok
$ perl -MAcme::No -e\'no mod_perl 1.27; print \"ok\
\"\'
mod_perl version 1.2701 too high--version less than 1.27 required at -e line 0
$ perl -MAcme::No -e\'no mod_perl 2.0; print \"ok\
\"\'
ok
|
RPM found in directory: /packages/linux-pbone/ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/devel:/languages:/perl:/CPAN-A/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/noarch |
